Developer's Corner

Although feeds aren't a new invention, lately they are getting more popular. Using feeds, we have an easy and convenient way to publish content, either news or any other sources (blogs, articles, etc.)

I had to implement feeding capabilities to a PHP application I'm working on, and I've been suggested to use FeedCreator, an open source library written, by Kai Blankenhorn, which provides support for the following feeds:

• RSS (0.91, 1.0, 2.0)
• PIE (0.1)
• MBOX
• OPML
• ATOM
• HTML
• JS

The most diffused are undoubtedly RSS and Atom, but if you need less known format you can.

Adding feeds to your application is as simple as writing the following code (taken from the library documentation):

include("feedcreator.class.php"); 

$rss = new UniversalFeedCreator(); 
$rss->useCached(); // use cached version if age<1 hour 
$rss->title = "PHP news"; 
$rss->description = "daily news from the PHP scripting world"; 

//optional 
$rss->descriptionTruncSize = 500; 
$rss->descriptionHtmlSyndicated = true; 

$rss->link = "http://www.dailyphp.net/news"; 
$rss->syndicationURL = "http://www.dailyphp.net/".$_SERVER["PHP_SELF"]; 

$image = new FeedImage(); 
$image->title = "dailyphp.net logo"; 
$image->url = "http://www.dailyphp.net/images/logo.gif"; 
$image->link = "http://www.dailyphp.net"; 
$image->description = "Feed provided by dailyphp.net. Click to visit."; 

//optional 
$image->descriptionTruncSize = 500; 
$image->descriptionHtmlSyndicated = true; 

$rss->image = $image; 

// get your news items from somewhere, e.g. your database: 
mysql_select_db($dbHost, $dbUser, $dbPass); 
$res = mysql_query("SELECT * FROM news ORDER BY newsdate DESC"); 
while ($data = mysql_fetch_object($res)) { 
$item = new FeedItem(); 
$item->title = $data->title; 
$item->link = $data->url; 
$item->description = $data->short; 

//optional 
item->descriptionTruncSize = 500; 
item->descriptionHtmlSyndicated = true; 

$item->date = $data->newsdate; 
$item->source = "http://www.dailyphp.net"; 
$item->author = "John Doe"; 

$rss->addItem($item); 
} 

// valid format strings are: RSS0.91, RSS1.0, RSS2.0, PIE0.1 (deprecated), 
// MBOX, OPML, ATOM, ATOM0.3, HTML, JS 
echo $rss->saveFeed("RSS1.0", "news/feed.xml");

What makes it so special is that it is really simple to use.

The libray is open source, released under the LGPL license.

For more information and to download the library, click here

I have a registration form which uses 2 dependent list boxes Country and State, where State is populated basing on the Country selection.

To dynamically load the State list box I had to add a client OnChange event to the Country list box, which submits the form. But at this point the form displays all errors (mostly missing fields) and I don't want this to happen.

This is the solution I found, which uses client side JavaScript:

The name of my form is RegisteredUser

1. I have added a hidden field to the form, with name
   Validation, Control Source Type = "Code Expression", type Boolean and default value = True
2. I've added a client OnChange event to the Country list box, with the following code:
   document.forms["RegisteredUser"].Validation.value = "No";
   document.forms["RegisteredUser"].submit();
3. In the HTML code, I've located the {Errors} row, and set the id and name attributes to phErrors - it should look like:

   <!-- BEGIN Error --> 
   <tr class="Error" id="phErrors" name="phErrors"> 
     <td colspan="2">{Error}</td> 
   </tr> 
   <!-- END Error --> 

4. I've added a client OnLoad event to the form, with the following code:
   var phErrors = document.getElementById ("phErrors");

   if (phErrors != null) 
   { 
     if (document.forms["RegisteredUser"].Validation.value == "No") 
     { 
       document.forms["RegisteredUser"].Validation.value = "Yes"; 
       phErrors.style.visibility = "hidden"; 
       phErrors.style.position = "absolute"; 
     } 
     else 
     { 
       phErrors.style.visibility = "visible"; 
       phErrors.style.position = "relative"; 
     } 
   } 
   

This code reads the value of the Validation hidden field: if the value is No, the phErrors row is hidden, otherwise it is shown.

It seems to work correctly, and also it shouldn't add the row to the database, because the validation occurs at server side, but it isn't displayed at client side (although included in the HTML).

I receive about 20 spam messages in my mailbox every day. I know this can be considered a low number, since I know of users receiving hundreds of spam, with a variety of subjects, ranging from porn sites to viagra, medicines, casino, software, etc.

I wonder how can these spammers think that I'm so stupid to use my credit card to buy their products - but indeed I'm afraid that if they persist in their illegal business is because there are people who buy from them.

Anyway, what can we do to fight against them? There are several services which detect messages and prevent them from reaching our mail client, and mail client add-ons which move suspect messages into a spam folder, so that we don't have to waste time reading messages we aren't interested in. But is this a good way to fight spammers? Do they prevent spammers from sending you emails if you don't buy from them? Unfortunately I don't think so.

What can we do? Report spam.

Since Internet has no country borders, it's quite unlikely that recurring to law leads to a result, although I think this could be done - but unfortunately it doesn't happen.

The only thing I can do is to repay them with the same money: making them waste time.

• the ISP used by the spammer to send the email
• the web hosting company which hosts the site referenced in the spam email

The next step was to write a complain email to both recipients, asking for the spammer's account to be suspended. This way, the spammer needs to change ISP and move its website to another hosting provider. This is a cost of their business, and I'm sure spammers have planned it - and I also want to be sure to keep this cost high for them.

I was used to perform these actions manually, by reading the email header, and using tools such as nslookup to find what I needed, but this is undoubtedly a time consuming process, and I did it while the number of spams was less than 10 per day.

But there is a better way: a service where you simply have to report the mail body and headers, and it will take care of reverse-engineering the information required, automatically fill in complaint reports and send them to the proper recipients. Its name is SpamCop, and their website is www.spamcop.net. Although the service requires a subscription (quite low, since it is about 1$ for each Mbyte of reported spam), it can also be used for free, in this case with a delay screen which reminds about subscribing - about 10 seconds to wait before completing the spam email analysis.

This of course doesn't guarantee that actions are taken against spammers. There are ISP which themselves fight against spammers, and once they receive reports they verify, and if required take their actions, which can range from deactivating the spammer's accounts to charge them and using legal ways (but this last one is the least used - unfortunately).

The universal technology

I've seen a lot of developers telling that Linux is better than Windows, C# is better than Java, Delphi is better than VC++, and so on. But if you ask them if they know the other language they are comparing with, they say no.

I was one of them, since I believed that the best IDE was Delphi, the best platform was Windows, and the best language was C++. At least, until I started working on "real projects" and not on applications made just for fun. When I had to learn Java and use it to develop server applications on Sun platforms, I started to appreciate the language and the Unix-like environments.... and I started to believe that these technologies were better than those I thought were the best. Soon I realized that every technology is the best, depending on where it is applied.

There is no universal technology or language which solves all problems

Now I don't believe anymore that there is the universal technology or language which solves all problems. Every time I start a new project, if the customer doesn't have a specific preference, I always spend some time trying to understand what are the best tools to implement the project - and the result depends from the project itself. In web development my favorite preference is the .NET technology, for several reasons - but this is not a choice that can be done every time for every project. For example, if one of the requirements is that the application must run on open source environments, .NET wouldn’t be the proper choice.

The proper tools

During my professional experience I've tried to learn as many languages as possible. If I get confident knowledge of each language, I'm able to choose the best solution for every problem, from both the developer point of view (how simple or hard is the development using a specific language) as well as from the customer/project point of view (what are the benefits if I choose a technology instead of another). When I learned Java, I appreciated how life is easier with a memory manager which automatically disposes objects no longer referenced. When I learned C#, I appreciated the integration with the .NET technology, the foreach statement, but I also noticed how exception handling was better in Java, since exceptions must be explicitly handled within each method or the method itself must be declared to throw those exceptions which aren't handled in its body. I also, and still, like the C++ philosophy: "The developer always knows what he's doing". This is the reason why C++ offers more power with pointers and access to memory. It's irrelevant that it's not always true the developer always knows what he is doing :-) The key point is that you have the power to do almost everything, although at a price (usually more attention when dealing with pointers and dynamically allocated memory, and more debugging....)

PHP Revolution

Lately I've appreciated a language I've used in the past, and which I didn't like: PHP. The reason why I don't like PHP is that I prefer strongly typed variables, variable declarations, as well as to know from the compiler if I wrote something wrong in my code, such as the name of a variable (a common mistake in PHP which leads to unpredictable results) or a function call (which usually leads to a run-time error). But I have to say that it's extremely practical the ability to save your PHP code and test it immediately without the need of recompilation, deployment, etc. - a perfect solution for the project I'm currently working on. And I wouldn't had chosen it if the customer hadn't explicitly asked for it. We never stop learning!! Now I'll definitively choose it again in the future, if the prerequisites for its usage are good, and the project will benefit from its usage.

Can I say that C# is better than Java?

Yes and no. It depends. As outlined above, in order to state that a language or technology is better than another, I need to:

1. have proficient knowledge of both
2. compare pro and cons applied to a specific project

But the result of the comparison is limited to the project - on a different project, the choice could be different:

• if I need to care about speed, maybe the best solution would be C++, but not for web applications
• if I need portability, Java is best - but I wouldn't choose it if the application has a user interface
• if I need modularity and easy of development on a web application, my choice would fall on ASP.NET
• if I need low licenses cost, the choice could be PHP, Java/JSP, or Ruby On Rails

Your opinion

How do you choose the technologies and languages on your projects? Do you focus on a single technology, and use others only when the customer explicitly asks for them?

The first computer

I started dealing with development when I was 12, after I convinced my parents to buy me a computer. My choice fell on a Commodore Vic 20, a computer with a 1MHz CPU, 3582 bytes (bytes!!) of RAM memory, embedded basic language, and external memory storage based on a tape recorder.

I learned the computer principles, the way it works, the Basic language, the assembler language, how to deal with limited resources (such as memory) and how to develop software. I wrote a few games, just for fun - too young to think about how to make money with them :). Since then, I have ever learned, learned and learned, and almost all of what I know I learned by myself.

The first job

When I've been contacted by a company for my first "serious" job, I've been subject to a 2 weeks test to implement some new features on an existing FoxPro application before getting a contract. Never worked with FoxPro before, nor had experience with its scripting language and more generally with database development (just a few theorical concepts).

So, during these 2 weeks, I studied and learned FoxPro, its language, and how to use databases. Life isn't so easy, so 2 days before the end of my test period I had an HD failure, and of course I didn't have any backup - all work was lost. Since it was a new HD, we brought it to the support center, asking to repair it but preserving the data, if possible - after 1 hour, a technician get back to us telling "The hard disk is working so well that we've also formatted it". Panic.

Fortunately I've been able to recover all lost data by using an unformatting utility - with compliments of my boss, who told me "I don't know why, but I thought you were a database expert - I've just read your resume again, and I have no idea why I thought so. Anyway I like the way you work, so the job is yours".

My next task was a feasibility study about a QuickTime application running on a Mac to be used to display and record data retrieved from medical equipments - once again, I had no previous experience with QuickTime and Mac - nevertheless, this has been not only the first but also the last experience with a Mac :-). In 1 week, the time given to complete this task, I provided the results of the feasibility study - which were positive.

Learning by Using

What do I want to say?

Sometimes we have to learn a new language or technology, but we have no time to learn it since we also have to apply it in the project we have to work on, and which, surprisingly, must be completed within yesterday.

I'm used to learn everything I need in my work by myself. This is undoubtedly a great advantage, since I don't need to attend courses or use other forms of slow "formal learning".

What I mostly like is the ability to learn a new language or technology by using it on a real project. Of course this can't be done without having a proficient knowledge of the area being explored. If somebody has never developed or learned a programming language, it's extremely unlikely he will be able to learn using this learning pattern.

But if, for instance, you have done web development before, using ASP.NET, it wouldn't be difficult to move on PHP. Once you've acquired what web development means, what you expect to do and what tools you have to use and you are allowed to use, you're able to transpose this knowledge on the new language - it's just a matter of translating what you already know in a new context. You expect that, independently from the language you use, there is a way to handle sessions and cookies, to access to a database, to handle data submitted in a form, etc.

This is the reason why I like to learn new languages and technologies. I like the challenge of starting from a virtually unknown area, performing analysis and design on a real project basing on a few information I read here and there, and starting the development phase while starting the learning process at the same time. This process undoubtedly slows the development at beginning, to proceed at increased speed from day to day. And while proceeding with the learning process you also realize what you've made wrong - this sometimes requires re-working on the work made in the past days, but this way you better understand what you did wrong and you (hopefully) won't do it again.

Formal learning

Of course the "learning by using" pattern cannot be considered better than formal learning paths. Attending a course has its advantages, since who is teaching has proficient knowledge (or at least we hope he has :-)) and he can better show the key points and focus on the most important things to know, as well as explain best practices, things to know, things to avoid, and so on.

Also, reading a good book and doing practice, following code, examples and exercises, helps to get knowledge. Anyway I usually skip all of these extra activities, since I prefer to focus on understanding what the writer want to expose, catching the key points, just to know that "they exist" - when I need to use a specific feature, I know it is there, and I just have to browse the documentation to know how to use it.

Knowledge or Pointers?

What I've just written above points me to the following consideration.

I strongly believe that actual knowledge is not as important as the ability to acquire that knowledge. Long time ago I've been told "it's not important if you have a specific knowledge - I care more if you are able to find the pointers to that knowledge".

Conclusions

Traditional learning (either school, courses, and so on) is important. But it isn't enough. Being able to self-learn helps when you have no time to use the traditional learning paths. Being able to learn while applying what you're learning is an extra gear. Being able to update your knowledge "on demand" is a double extra gear.

What are your learning methodologies? Do you want to add any comment, suggestion, or extend this discussion? Just write below...